Which static site generators are worth considering as Jekyll alternatives?
Jekyll is an open-source static site generator (SSG) that is easy to set up and known for its fast build speeds. Depending on your project requirements, another tool might be a better fit. Popular Jekyll alternatives include Hugo, Gatsby, Next.js, Nuxt, Astro and Eleventy.
What is Jekyll and when might an alternative be useful?
Jekyll is an open source static site generator built in Ruby. It uses Liquid templates to transform HTML fragments, Markdown or Textile data into static HTML pages ready for deployment. Jekyll is easy to configure, integrates seamlessly with GitHub Pages and generates sites quickly. Due to the fact that it separates content from design, Jekyll is a great choice for blogs, documentation and portfolio sites.
- Intuitive website builder with AI assistance
- Create captivating images and texts in seconds
- Domain, SSL and email included
However, if you need interactive features, dynamic data connections, or server-side rendering, Jekyll quickly shows its limitations. Large projects or workflows that require built-in features like routing or APIs, may benefit from a more flexible solution or one that offers higher performance. Which is the best Jekyll alternative for you will, of course, depend on your project’s specific needs.
Hugo
Hugo is an open-source static site generator renowned for its incredibly fast build times. Even very large sites with thousands of pages can be built in milliseconds. Hugo is a single-binary tool written in Golang, meaning it consists of one executable file that contains everything needed for deployment. Configuration options are available in YAML, JSON, or TOML.
Thanks to multilingual support and powerful taxonomy system, this alternative to Jekyll is flexible enough for event pages, project documentation, and landing pages. Using Go templates, layouts and designs can be implemented quickly with shortcodes and variable placeholders.
| Advantages | Disadvantages |
|---|---|
| Extremely fast build speeds | Go programming language is less common |
| Runs on almost any platform as a single-binary | No native server-side rendering or API routing |
| Suitable for large websites | Needs additional tools for complex interactive features |
| Open-source with a large and active community | |
| Built-in support for taxonomies (classification schemes) and multilingual content |
Gatsby
Gatsby is an open-source SSG based on React and GraphQL, released in 2015. It supports building SEO-optimized websites and progressive web apps (PWAs). Content can be sourced through GraphQL queries from Markdown files, headless CMS, or APIs. Thanks to automatic code-splitting strategies, each page only loads the resources it needs, significantly improving performance for users.
A standout feature of this Jekyll alternative is its extensive plugin ecosystem, offering more than 2,500 plugins for everything from image optimization to e-commerce and analytics. With Version 4, Gatsby added server-side rendering (SSR) and Deferred Static Generation (DSG), enabling dynamic content on Node.js servers. The combination of a React-based framework, large plugin library, and modern rendering methods makes Gatsby ideal for data-driven web projects.
- Get online faster with AI tools
- Fast-track growth with AI marketing
- Save time, maximize results
| Advantages | Disadvantages |
|---|---|
| Extensive plugin ecosystem (2,500+ plugins) | Build times grow with with more plugins and large datasets |
| Seamless data integration with GraphQL | High reliance on plugins |
| Supports SSR and DSG (from Version 4) | Requires knowledge of React, GraphQL and Node.js) |
| Built-in PWA support | Potential version conflicts between plugins |
| Pre-fetching for faster page loads | Tightly coupled with the Node.js ecosystem |
Next.js
Next.js is an open-source React framework supporting both static site generation (SSG) and server-side rendering (SSR). With the getStaticProps function, content can be generated at build time for fast delivery through CDNs (networks of regionally distributed servers). For dynamic data fetching on every request, the getServerSideProps function is available. Incremental Static Regeneration (ISR) lets you update individual pages without rebuilding the entire site.
Next.js includes built-in API routes for serverless endpoints and optimizations for images, scripts, and fonts. It supports multiple styling options, including CSS modules, global CSS, SASS and Tailwind CSS. The Middleware feature allows custom code to run before completing a request. As an alternative to Jekyll, Next.js is a strong choice if you need to combine static pages with server-rendered or personalized content.
| Advantages | Disadvantages |
|---|---|
| Supports SSG, SSR and ISR | Documentation mainly focuses on Linux and macOS |
| Serverless endpoints with built-in API routes | More complex setup than purely static generators |
| Easy cloud deployment and optimization with Vercel | Requires JavaScript and React knowledge |
| Automatic image, font and script optimization |
Nuxt
Nuxt is an open-source framework based on Vue.js offering universal rendering, combining static site generation (SSG), server-side rendering (SSR) and single-page application modes (SPA) in one development environment. Nuxt pre-renders pages on the server, delivering a complete HTML page before Vue.js handles client-side interactivity. The Nitro server engine allows hosting on everything from serverless platforms to traditional VPS instances.
Nuxt also offers a clear folder structure, automatic component and middleware imports, path-based routing, and integrated API routes. Built-in features like image optimization, TypeScript support, and global state management speed up complex web app development. This means, compared to other Jekyll alternatives, Next is particularly well suited for projects needing dynamic content, personalized user experiences and complex backend logic.
| Advantages | Disadvantages |
|---|---|
| Universal rendering (SSG, SSR, and SPA in one framework) | Dependency on the Vue ecosystem |
| Clear folder system with auto-imports | More complex than basic SSGs |
| Serverless backend logic with API routes | Smaller community |
| 200+ extensions available | Requires JavaScript and Vue expertise |
Astro
The JavaScript framework Astro has gained popularity among developers for building fast, content-rich websites. Unlike other Jekyll alternatives, it uses an island architecture, splitting the interface into Astro Islands—subcomponents that can be used across different pages.
To maximize performance, Astro converts unused JavaScript code into HTML and offers both SSG and SSR functionalities, configurable on a per-page basis. Astro is also framework-agnostic, meaning it can be used with any JavaScript framework. It can also be deployed on traditional servers or edge environments.
| Advantages | Disadvantages |
|---|---|
| Very small JavaScript bundles due to island architecture | Different approach compared to traditional static site generators |
| Framework-independent | Smaller plugin and theme ecosystem |
| Simple syntax for quick onboarding | Less ideal for highly interactive apps |
| Fast build times | Complex integration with third-party systems |
| High flexibility |
Eleventy
For those wanting a lean, simply structured SSG software, Eleventy (often 11ty for short) is a great Jekyll alternative. This JavaScript-based generator follows a static-first philosophy, meaning it’s designed primarily for HTML documents that don’t need to be updated once they are loaded in the browser. That said, the software also supports dynamic websites when needed.
There are plenty of reasons to choose Eleventy. On one hand, it enables the creation of static websites without requiring the use of client-side JavaScript frameworks. On the other, it delivers extremely fast build times that many competitors can’t match. In addition, the generator supports a wide range of template languages—from HTML and Markdown to JavaScript, SASS, and even MDX.
| Advantages | Disadvantages |
|---|---|
| Works right after installation | Requires some technical knowledge for customization |
| Supports multiple template languages | Smaller community |
| Creates static sites without a JavaScript framework | No built-in support for interactive frontend components |
| Very fast build times—even with large pipelines | No native dynamic JavaScript rendering |

