The value of certain assets isn’t set in stone: financial disasters, natural cat­a­stro­phes or extreme market fluc­tu­a­tions can lead to un­fore­seen economic damages. As soon as an im­pair­ment is noticed on one of your ac­count­able prop­er­ties, you should carry out an im­pair­ment test. This makes it possible to conduct an as­sess­ment of the capital assets, which is important for making a correct as­sess­ment of the company’s value.

What is im­pair­ment?

The term 'im­pair­ment' refers to the current value of an asset no longer cor­re­spond­ing to its balance sheet amount. This means that the in­for­ma­tion disclosed in the balance sheet is no longer correct. The company would end up showing the assets as being mis­lead­ing­ly high or mis­rep­re­sent­ing its value. In principle, all assets and li­a­bil­i­ties that can be placed on a balance sheet can be impaired (apart from con­struc­tion contracts). Under the generally accepted ac­count­ing prin­ci­ples (GAAP), impaired assets are addressed in Statement 144 and the Im­pair­ment or Disposal of Long-Lived Asset sub­sec­tion of ASC 360-10. More in­for­ma­tion can be found on the In­vesto­pe­dia website.

Most items that a company purchases, such as machines, vehicles, or IT equipment are generally subject to im­pair­ment due to wear and tear. As a result, scheduled de­pre­ci­a­tion is applied to such items: ac­coun­tants start reducing the book value of assets from when they are purchased until they are sold, lost, or scrapped. In addition, ac­coun­tants also provide an un­sched­uled de­pre­ci­a­tion. This can occur both in the case of assets that de­pre­ci­ate according to plan, as well as those that are affected by an un­ex­pect­ed loss in value. It also applies in the case of valuables with an in­def­i­nite lifespan. You cannot write off the latter as planned. In any case, you must first perform an im­pair­ment test.

What is the purpose of an im­pair­ment test?

Im­pair­ment tests are regulated by the Internal Revenue Service, the Financial Ac­count­ing Standards Board, and the Gov­ern­men­tal Ac­count­ing Standards Board. These are mandatory lowest value tests and their purpose is to determine the actual value of assets. This makes it possible to make a reliable statement about a company’s current assets – this is par­tic­u­lar­ly important for investors. Im­pair­ment tests are carried out in ac­cor­dance with FASB Statement No. 144 whenever a suspected im­pair­ment exists. In­di­ca­tions can be internal as well as external.

Internal in­di­ca­tions are, for example:

  • Aging
  • Physical damages
  • When the use of something is less valuable than before due to re­struc­tur­ing
  • Prof­itabil­i­ty is lower than expected

External in­di­ca­tions include:

  • Declining market value
  • Poor economic and financial de­vel­op­ments
  • Increase in market interest rates
  • Falling stock exchange

In­tan­gi­ble assets with an in­def­i­nite lifespan and those that are not yet ready for ap­pli­ca­tion as well as goodwills must be tested each year for im­pair­ment. You can decide yourself when the testing should be carried out but once you’ve chosen a date, you must stick to it every year.

Fact

Four fifths of all companies schedule the oblig­a­tory im­pair­ment test for the balance sheet's deadline date.

Firstly, you determine the re­cov­er­able amount of the asset: this is either the net sale price or the value in use.

  • Net sales price: the number of sales generated by a company after the deduction of returns, al­lowances for damaged or missing good and any discounts allowed. 
  • Value in use: present value of future cash flows expected to be generated through use.

The higher value out of the two de­ter­mines the re­cov­er­able amount. This value is then compared with the carrying amount. The carrying amount is the value of an asset as reported in the balance sheet.

If the com­par­i­son shows that the carrying amount is above the re­cov­er­able amount, you have found an im­pair­ment. The con­se­quence: a non-scheduled de­pre­ci­a­tion up to the value of the re­cov­er­able amount.

LVm1pt4tcqQ.jpg To display this video, third-party cookies are required. You can access and change your cookie settings here.

Goodwill im­pair­ment test: example invoice

When a company buys up another firm, it pays a purchase price. Before pur­chas­ing the buyer must calculate all of the assets (including any assumed debt) that the other company has. This value is likely to be below the purchase price. The dif­fer­ence between the two values is called goodwill. The buyer accepts the dif­fer­ence because they assume that the purchased resources can be used to make a profit. The purchase generates synergies through customer potential, market shares, or profit prospects that aren’t included in the assets. The buyer shows their 'good­will' during the price ne­go­ti­a­tion.

Note

In the case of goodwill, a dis­tinc­tion is made between the de­riv­a­tive and the original goodwill. The latter is generated by the company itself rather than through ac­qui­si­tions and shouldn’t be activated.

One case study is the company, Albatros, who bought the company, Bravo, for $100 million. Financial experts from Albatros cal­cu­lat­ed that Bravo had an asset value of $60 million prior to the purchase. This meant that $40 million was counted as goodwill.

Goodwill appears as an asset on the balance sheet and counts towards the company’s value. However, it is possible that the goodwill could decrease in value within a year. Like certain other in­tan­gi­ble assets, goodwill is subject to an annual im­pair­ment test. The value, however, does not have an iden­ti­fi­able cash flow and cannot be sold. For this reason, a valuation level must be defined for the purpose of review, which is called a cash gen­er­at­ing unit (CGU). This is directly related to the goodwill and must be con­sis­tent­ly selected from set­tle­ment period to set­tle­ment period (con­sis­ten­cy rule). For example, the purchased company, or a de­part­ment of this company, can be defined as CGU.

Bravo was not as suc­cess­ful as hoped, un­for­tu­nate­ly. After one year, Albatros realized that the value in use was $70 million and the net sale price was $80 million. Compared to the carrying amount of $100 million ($80 million assets + $20 million goodwill), the re­cov­er­able amount was $80 million. Albatros recorded a goodwill im­pair­ment of $20 million.

Now the company has to write off the goodwill in order to adjust the balance to the actual value. In the case of Albatros and Bravo, the goodwill is 100%. If the goodwill is higher than the carrying amount, no ap­pre­ci­a­tion will occur. In this case, the carrying amount stays as it is.

Summary

Im­pair­ment tests are an important means of making sure a company’s balance sheet is as accurate as possible. Im­pair­ment test vi­o­la­tions lead to errors on the balance sheet and, therefore, to a false eval­u­a­tion of the company.

Click here for important legal dis­claimers.

Reviewer

Go to Main Menu