In addition to the "sole" EBITDA described, there is also the term adjusted or cleaned EBITDA. For this value, extraordinary costs and income are deducted from the company result, but not costs which are more closely related to the company activities – for example, depreciation on the investments used for this. However, there is no precise definition as to what is included in these extraordinary costs and earnings. The significance of this key figure is therefore also limited when comparing different companies.
Due to its limited significance when it comes to the overall success of a company, EBITDA has been subject to criticism in years gone by. The reason for this is that some companies have tried to disguise their poor financial position using the figure. As already mentioned, strictly speaking it gives no information about the financial situation of a company. For example, the internet company AOL Time Warner announced that their EBITDA was USD 9.8 billion, and thereby tried to deflect attention from a loss of USD 54 billion, which was not captured by this figure. As some companies went even further and tried to make company results more attractive under the guise of EBITDA, economists have also used a sarcastic acronym to describe it: “earnings before I tricked the dumb auditor”.