Each brainstorming session will vary from group to group and you, as the host, must plan each session separately. If needed, answer the following questions with the help of your co-workers:
- How many participants will there be in the brainstorm? Although there is no optimal number of participants set for brainstorming sessions, including too many people poses a risk to the flow of ideas, as people might feel intimidated by crowds. On the other hand, a group which is too small bears fruit to very few ideas. Finding the right balance is crucial. It is therefore worth analyzing the right size of the group for your projects in your work setting.
- How are the participants chosen? Has personality, sex, work position, nationality, native language, or area of expertise been the decisive factor when selecting participants? Since brainstorming is at its best when each participant actively takes part in the discussion, you should consider finding the right balance here as well. Some may express themselves more openly and be more dominant than those who shy away from any form of action. Weighing out members according to personality and sex therefore limits unwanted interfering patterns. The same applies to various work positions. If you build a team of five people, four of which are full-time employees and one being an intern, it is highly likely that the latter will take little part in the brainstorm. You should therefore arrange participants in such a way that they do not inhibit each other.
In a multinational setting, it is important to consider the various language barriers if you plan on doing an international brainstorming session. Generally speaking, English is the first choice. However, it is also worth noting that allowing each participant to express their ideas in their mother tongue will get the most out of them. Translation of the ideas can then be done during the evaluation phase.
Lastly, you should not forget that people brainstorm better when they are already considered experts in the field under investigation. However, experts can also quickly take full control over the brainstorming session and leave the unexperienced out of the picture. On the other hand, people who are not considered specialists can also come up with fresh, innovative ideas, which is the desired result of any brainstorm.
- Who is the opinion leader? In many groups, it is rather easy to identify dominant opinion leaders of whom an active participation during each brainstorming session is generally expected. Though people with a motivating personality are always needed, too many contributions coming from one person can either act as a demotivating factor for other participants or can be seen as seizing the chance of the less open people to have any say in the matter. If you have identified such a person, a one-on-one conversation in which you highlight the problem should take place before the session. Naturally, you also avail of the chance to cleverly get others more involved during the brainstorm. The more you know about the group and its opinion leader, the easier it is to carry out the above steps.
Think about an appropriate introduction, in which you present the problem in a short and precise way without going too much into detail. Otherwise, you subconsciously risk having too much influence on the upcoming ideas of your participants. To make sure that each participant is aware of the various brainstorming methods, take time to explain the general conditions (time limit, ways of participation etc.) and the rules (quantity over quality, no criticism policy, letting everyone express themselves etc.). Most importantly, however, the actual question of the brainstorming session should be answered as creatively as possible. You should therefore ideally pre-formulate your introduction. Here are some examples of “brainstorming cheat sheets”:
Task: “A new slogan for our drink”
Rules:
- Put out new ideas or refine already existing ones – no need to raise your hand before you speak out loud
- Criticisms and thematically irrelevant comments are not allowed
- Keep contributions short, each should preferably consist of slogans ONLY
- ALL slogans will be written down on the whiteboard by the host
- Time limit: 30 minutes
- Final evaluation of ideas and open discussion (approx. 1 hour), only one slogan can win