Although the work-life balance model is generally accepted and more and more companies are beginning to promote it, there are also some voices who regard the concept as problematic.
One common criticism views the work-life balance as a myth. It is an ideal situation that is practically unachievable because life is unfortunately not so easy to plan. The concept ignores the chaotic nature of life, which simply cannot be brought under control by careful planning. Additionally, the model ignores important skills such as adaptability and improvisation. At the same time, it tries to prescribe people a “life management” concept that is essentially impossible in this form. Ironically, too much stringent life planning can often add even more stress to any situation.
A further point of criticism is the term “work-life balance” itself. This suggests that work and life are two completely different fields. Critics of the model often argue that this division is next to impossible because there is so much crossover between the two areas. Additionally, if an employee is dissatisfied with their work, this cannot simply be mended by improving their work-life balance, but rather by changing jobs.
In reaction to such criticism, work-life integration was introduced, an alternative concept that takes a slightly more modern approach to the idea of a work-life balance. It focuses on a seamless combination of one’s personal and professional life rather than the separation or division of the two elements. Work-life effectiveness, another alternative, also follows a similar notion.
Many critics also criticize the prioritization of “balance” in the work-life balance model. People are inherently unbalanced, which is not necessarily a negative thing. For many a successful professional life is enough to be happy and productive; some employees even gain more strength from an inner restlessness, which drives them to even better achievements. Additionally, many divide their lives into periods of concentrating more on their professional or private lives. It is important to remember, however, that the work-life balance aims to provide an ideal general state of health that should not, and could not, be applied to everybody.
Further criticism is directed against the individual measures of the work-life balance. Flexible working hours do not suit everyone, while a strictly planned work day could also have many advantages from planning security to better sleep (although there are many scientific uncertainties about sleep). Facilities such as company childcare centers can sometimes be a source of additional stress as some people enjoy their time at work and away from their families.
Many of the factors listed above have been described by critics as contradictory: if employees are offered fresh fruit and flexible working hours, and then go out and enjoy themselves, this does not exactly mean they have a sufficient work-life balance. Critics of the work-life balance tend to lean towards a positive corporate social responsibility that creates a healthy framework for good work. This then deems concepts such as the work-life balance as superfluous and the term itself as a redundant buzzword.